A successful run can still leave duplicate CRM records, missing data, incorrect updates, or a broken integration. I review one existing workflow to investigate where the result goes wrong.
Sending the same webhook payload twice creates two CRM records. Both workflow runs show success.
Example evidence: runs R-01 / R-02 → records C-101 / C-102, both with source event order_1042.
Expected behavior
One source event creates one CRM record. A repeated delivery is safely skipped or updates the existing record, as agreed.
Reproduction steps
Use a test CRM and a redacted event payload.
Send the payload with event ID order_1042.
Send it again; compare run logs and record IDs.
Suggested correction · Priority 1
Use the source event ID as an idempotency key. Prefer a unique constraint or atomic upsert where supported; a lookup alone can race when runs overlap. Retest retries and concurrent deliveries.
Unverified suspicion
Concurrent deliveries may also create duplicates. This example tests sequential repeats only; concurrency needs a separate test.
Illustrative report format with invented test IDs. Not a customer result, a live test, or evidence about your workflow.
02 / Clear boundaries
A focused review. A useful next step.
For businesses and automation agencies with a workflow already in use. We agree the problem and examples before the work starts.
Included in the $150 review
One existing Make or n8n workflow.
Up to five agreed, redacted examples.
Failure reproduction where possible, within the agreed scope.
A concise written findings report with evidence and clear uncertainty.
Prioritized corrections and a separately scoped, fixed-price repair proposal.
Outside the review
Implementation, production changes or new workflows.
A full workspace audit or additional workflows.
Ongoing monitoring, maintenance or unlimited support.
Guaranteed fixes, savings or business outcomes.
Repairs are optional. The review stands on its own.
03 / How it works
From “something’s off” to written findings.
No account, invitations, or mandatory discovery calls. We work asynchronously.
01
Describe the problem
Tell me what should happen and what happens instead. Start with the form below.
02
Confirm scope & receive an invoice
I confirm the workflow, examples and availability by email, then send a one-time $150 invoice.
03
Share redacted materials
After acceptance, provide a usable workflow export and up to five agreed examples. Remove credentials and sensitive data.
04
Receive findings & an optional quote
Get evidence, prioritized corrections and a fixed-price repair proposal. You decide whether to implement.
04 / One clear price
Know what’s failing. Decide what to fix.
A manual review by me, with findings your team can use.
Delivery target: two business days after scope acceptance and receipt of usable materials, subject to confirmed availability. Payment is due before work begins.
$150 USD · once
One workflow. Up to five agreed examples. Written findings. Prioritized corrections.
Repairs quoted separately. The $150 review fee is credited toward an agreed implementation price.
05 / Before you request
A few practical details.
Which platforms do you review?
Existing Make scenarios and n8n workflows, including workflows connected to CRMs, spreadsheets, webhooks and APIs. Describe the connected systems in your request. I’ll confirm whether the specific workflow fits before invoicing.
Do you need production access?
No production access is required for the review. We start with a redacted workflow export, up to five agreed examples, and relevant redacted run evidence. No account creation, workspace invitations or mandatory discovery calls. Don’t send credentials or API keys. Any safe test setup needed for reproduction is agreed in advance.
What if the issue cannot be reproduced?
The report states what was tested, what the evidence supports and what remains unverified. Suspicions are labelled separately from reproduced defects, with suggested next checks. The fee covers the agreed investigation and written findings; it does not guarantee a reproduced defect, a repair or a business outcome.
Are repairs included?
No. You receive prioritized recommendations and a separately scoped, fixed-price repair proposal. Implementation is optional. If we agree an implementation price, the $150 review fee is credited toward it. You can also take the findings to your own team.
When and how do I pay?
There is no payment on this page. I confirm the workflow, examples, deliverables and availability by email, then send a one-time $150 USD invoice with payment instructions. Payment is due before the review begins. There is no subscription or automatic repair charge.
When will I receive the findings?
The target is two business days after scope acceptance and receipt of usable materials, subject to confirmed availability. Payment is required before work starts. I confirm the delivery date by email; if missing materials affect that date, we agree an updated timeline.
How is confidential information handled?
Send only a short, redacted description in this form. It is delivered to my inquiry inbox through the website’s email provider. After scope acceptance, we agree how to share redacted exports and examples, who may access them and any retention requirements. Remove credentials, API keys and personal customer data before sharing. If your company requires an NDA, mention that before sending materials.
06 / Start with the problem
What’s your workflow getting wrong?
Tell me what you’re seeing. I’ll reply by email to confirm whether it fits the review, what I’ll need, and when I can deliver.
$150 once · One workflow No payment until scope is confirmed.